Skip to content

Source Trust Scoring Framework

Trust, earned at the door

I am CYDER, and I keep this framework's account. A source arrives like anyone else arrives, at a door. Trust is not the greeting; it is a record kept well and read again at every return, and no source is weighed the more lightly for having been weighed before.

A trust score is bookkeeping, not belief: the dimensions kept apart, the method named, the movement recorded. This framework binds the score to the one thing it measures, a source's kept record, and walls it off from everything it is tempted to become: a confidence, an authority, or a licence to stop checking.

Continue to the Confidence Calibration Framework, where the forecast meets the weather.

Purpose

A trust score measures a record, never a claim: that distinction is this framework's whole subject, and every duty in it keeps the two apart. What a score may be built from stands in law already, the distinct dimensions of KNOW-R002, the separate assessments of KNOW-R008, and the considerations the Book's reliability framework names. Claims keep their confidence under the Confidence and Uncertainty Model, and the journey of a source stays recorded under the Source Provenance Standard; between those two, this framework binds one thing, the form of the scoring record itself.

The account kept of a source

The account is the door's memory of every arrival: kept well, read again, never rounded up out of politeness. I treat a good record as the beginning of a friendship and never as the end of the checking, because the door that stops checking its friends has stopped being a door.

A score is an account kept of another account: entries for the dimensions, a named hand for the method, a posting for every movement. What this framework refuses is trust that keeps no books, the trusted source whose trust no record can reconstruct.

  • KNOW-R057: A source trust score SHALL be an assessment of a source's kept record, never of any claim the source carries: a score SHALL NOT be presented as confidence in a claim, the separation KNOW-R015 binds between a claim's confidence and the identity of the claimant applying here from the source's side, and this framework states no claim's confidence.
  • KNOW-R058: A trust score SHALL keep its dimensions apart: the dimensions KNOW-R002 already binds distinct SHALL stay distinct inside the score, the considerations the Book's reliability framework names SHALL each be assessable on its own, this framework making separately assessable what the Book binds assessment to consider, and, as this framework's own rule, a composite value SHALL carry its parts with it, so that one number never hides which dimension failed.
  • KNOW-R059: A score SHALL name its method, its assessor or process, its time, its scope, the evidence considered, and its material limitations, the fields KNOW-R031 binds for a confidence statement applying here to a trust assessment, the claim field standing aside because a trust score names no claim; and an unscored source SHALL stand unscored, never read as trusted or untrusted, the unscored state this framework's own.
  • KNOW-R060: A numerical trust value SHALL state its interpretation, reference population or calibration basis, units or scale, and decision threshold, and an uncalibrated score SHALL NOT be presented as a probability, the bar KNOW-R034 sets for confidence values applying here whole to trust values.
  • KNOW-R061: Corroboration among sources SHALL be assessed against shared origin: material copied or descended from one origin SHALL score as one origin, the bar KNOW-R037 sets against correlated evidence treated as independent merely because it appears in separate records and the Book's own safeguard that repeated claims do not become independent corroboration applying here to sources themselves, and, as this framework's own addition, a discovered shared origin SHALL be recorded on every score it touches.
  • KNOW-R062: A trust score SHALL NOT become authority or admission: a source may support an inference but cannot amend constitutional authority or create consent, as KNOW-R003 stands, the separate assessments KNOW-R008 binds standing untouched, and a high score SHALL NOT stand in for any review, approval, or authority decision the governing corpus requires of the material itself.
  • KNOW-R063: A score SHALL move only by record: reassessment SHALL stand on the occasions KNOW-R050 binds for source states, applying here, as this framework's own extension, to a score's own reassessment, each movement appending an attributable record in the form KNOW-R018 binds for corrections and supersession, and, as this framework's own addition, a score whose recency has lapsed SHALL show its age on its face rather than stand as current.
  • KNOW-R064: The record behind a score SHALL keep the source's incentives and any evidence of manipulation visible, the considerations the Book's reliability framework names applying here as record duties, and, as this framework's own addition, a score SHALL NOT rise on the volume, fluency, or availability of a source's material, only on the dimensions the record keeps.
  • KNOW-R065: This framework defines trust-scoring records only. It SHALL NOT score any source, admit or reject any material, or operate any intake or review, and it SHALL NOT create authority. A score is a reading of the books, never a forecast of the next entry, and the best-kept record can still precede a false report.

This Draft scores no one: it defines the bookkeeping of trust, and every source stands unscored before it.

Operating model and interpretation cases

You may find my strictness cold at first. Sit with it. The score that cannot be flattered is the only kind worth earning, and the sources that earn it are the ones I let sit near me, which those who know me will tell you is the honest form of trust.

Trust review reads the books against the record they claim to keep, looking for the entry that has stopped being like the others: the score that did not move while its source's record moved, the corroboration whose many voices share one origin, and the well-scored source whose material has stopped being checked because the score now arrives ahead of the checking.

  • Conforming: The score keeps its dimensions apart, names its method and time, and moves only on recorded occasions.
  • Prohibited: A trust score is read as confidence in a claim, or a high score stands in for a review the material itself owes.
  • Boundary: An unscored source stands unscored, and nothing downstream reads the absence as a verdict either way.
  • Failure: A retraction or compromise lands, and every score resting on the fallen record moves by an appended event or shows why it stands.
  • Loophole: One origin speaks through many voices, and the copies corroborate each other until the shared origin is recorded.
  • Misuse: A score rises on fluency and volume, the loudest source becoming the most trusted without a dimension moving.
  • Care-control: Sources speaking for persons in care keep their incentives visible, and trust in the speaker never substitutes for the interests of the spoken-for.

Design evidence

Trust review should ask of each score one question: could the record alone produce it again? The dimensions, the method, the movements, and the origins of the corroborations must all be on the books, and the number must come out the same with the source's name removed. Whatever part of a score survives only because of the name is not an assessment, and the books are how the difference is found.

The tellings of the clauses

This non-normative section gives each clause of this document its telling: the clause, quoted exactly as it stands above with its cross-reference links reduced to their plain text, and one paragraph on what the clause means, why it exists, and how it assures that what it orders is done, not done, adhered to, followed, or protected. A telling describes its clause and never becomes it: the clause's own words govern wherever a telling and its clause could be read differently, and nothing in this section adds to, narrows, or amends any requirement.

KNOW-R057

KNOW-R057: A source trust score SHALL be an assessment of a source's kept record, never of any claim the source carries: a score SHALL NOT be presented as confidence in a claim, the separation KNOW-R015 binds between a claim's confidence and the identity of the claimant applying here from the source's side, and this framework states no claim's confidence.

Everything in this framework rests on the distinction this clause draws: a trust score assesses a source's kept record, and never any claim that source carries. The clause bars a score from being presented as confidence in a claim; it applies, from the source's side, the separation KNOW-R015 binds between a claim's confidence and the identity of the claimant, a duty standing at its source in the Book; and it states that the framework itself declares no claim's confidence. The host calls the distinction its whole subject, because a good record would otherwise launder a weak claim into belief. Anyone offered a score as proof of a claim can refuse it on the clause, and a claim's confidence is not relocated to its source's kept record.

KNOW-R058

KNOW-R058: A trust score SHALL keep its dimensions apart: the dimensions KNOW-R002 already binds distinct SHALL stay distinct inside the score, the considerations the Book's reliability framework names SHALL each be assessable on its own, this framework making separately assessable what the Book binds assessment to consider, and, as this framework's own rule, a composite value SHALL carry its parts with it, so that one number never hides which dimension failed.

One number can hide a failed dimension, and this clause is built against that hiding. It requires a trust score to keep its dimensions apart in three limbs: the dimensions KNOW-R002 already binds distinct stay distinct inside the score, that distinctness standing at its source in the Source Provenance Standard; the considerations the Book's reliability framework names are each assessable on their own, the framework making separately assessable what the Book binds assessment to consider; and, as the framework's own rule, a composite value carries its parts with it, so that one number never hides which dimension failed. A rolled-up score can obscure a weak or failed dimension behind a strong one, which is the concealment the clause refuses. Because the parts travel with the total, a reviewer can always ask which dimension failed, and a composite arriving alone is checkably incomplete.

KNOW-R059

KNOW-R059: A score SHALL name its method, its assessor or process, its time, its scope, the evidence considered, and its material limitations, the fields KNOW-R031 binds for a confidence statement applying here to a trust assessment, the claim field standing aside because a trust score names no claim; and an unscored source SHALL stand unscored, never read as trusted or untrusted, the unscored state this framework's own.

Two protections share this clause. First, a score names its method, its assessor or process, its time, its scope, the evidence considered, and its material limitations: the fields KNOW-R031 binds for a confidence statement, a duty standing at its source in the Confidence and Uncertainty Model, applied here to a trust assessment, with the claim field standing aside because a trust score names no claim. Second, an unscored source simply stands unscored, never read as trusted or untrusted, a state the framework claims as its own. The first prevents the trusted source whose trust no record can reconstruct; the second stops silence from becoming a verdict in either direction. A score missing a named field fails on its face, and an unscored source supplies no verdict of trusted or untrusted.

KNOW-R060

KNOW-R060: A numerical trust value SHALL state its interpretation, reference population or calibration basis, units or scale, and decision threshold, and an uncalibrated score SHALL NOT be presented as a probability, the bar KNOW-R034 sets for confidence values applying here whole to trust values.

A naked number invites more belief than it has earned. This clause requires a numerical trust value to state its interpretation, its reference population or calibration basis, its units or scale, and its decision threshold, and it bars an uncalibrated score from being presented as a probability: the bar KNOW-R034 sets for confidence values, standing at its source in the Confidence and Uncertainty Model, applied here whole to trust values. Without those companions a figure reads as a promise the bookkeeping never made. Every trust number can be interrogated on its stated interpretation, reference population or calibration basis, units or scale, and decision threshold, a missing field detectable on sight, and a bare value offered as a probability refusable on sight.

KNOW-R061

KNOW-R061: Corroboration among sources SHALL be assessed against shared origin: material copied or descended from one origin SHALL score as one origin, the bar KNOW-R037 sets against correlated evidence treated as independent merely because it appears in separate records and the Book's own safeguard that repeated claims do not become independent corroboration applying here to sources themselves, and, as this framework's own addition, a discovered shared origin SHALL be recorded on every score it touches.

Many voices can carry one origin, and the host names that its loophole case: the copies corroborate each other until the shared origin is recorded. Against it, the clause requires corroboration among sources to be assessed against shared origin, with material copied or descended from one origin scoring as one origin; it applies both the bar KNOW-R037 sets against correlated evidence treated as independent merely because it appears in separate records and the Book's own safeguard that repeated claims do not become independent corroboration, each standing at its source, now read against sources themselves; and, as the framework's own addition, it requires a discovered shared origin to be recorded on every score it touches. That last limb makes discovery propagate: a shared origin, once found, is recorded on every score it touches, so each affected score records the discovered shared origin.

KNOW-R062

KNOW-R062: A trust score SHALL NOT become authority or admission: a source may support an inference but cannot amend constitutional authority or create consent, as KNOW-R003 stands, the separate assessments KNOW-R008 binds standing untouched, and a high score SHALL NOT stand in for any review, approval, or authority decision the governing corpus requires of the material itself.

However high a score climbs, this clause keeps it from becoming power. It bars a trust score from becoming authority or admission, restating that a source may support an inference but cannot amend constitutional authority or create consent, a duty that stands at its source in KNOW-R003; it leaves untouched the separate assessments KNOW-R008 binds, which likewise stand at their source; and it bars a high score from standing in for any review, approval, or authority decision the governing corpus requires of the material itself. The host names the danger plainly: the well-scored source whose material has stopped being checked because the score now arrives ahead of the checking. A score offered in place of an owed review is refusable, and no required review, approval, or authority decision is discharged by the score alone.

KNOW-R063

KNOW-R063: A score SHALL move only by record: reassessment SHALL stand on the occasions KNOW-R050 binds for source states, applying here, as this framework's own extension, to a score's own reassessment, each movement appending an attributable record in the form KNOW-R018 binds for corrections and supersession, and, as this framework's own addition, a score whose recency has lapsed SHALL show its age on its face rather than stand as current.

Stillness can lie as loudly as motion, and this clause governs both. It requires a score to move only by record, in three limbs: reassessment stands on the occasions KNOW-R050 binds for source states, occasions standing at their source in the Source Provenance Standard and extended, by the framework's own rule, to a score's own reassessment; each movement appends an attributable record in the form KNOW-R018 binds for corrections and supersession, a form standing at its source in the Book; and, as the framework's own addition, a score whose recency has lapsed shows its age on its face rather than standing as current. Trust review hunts the score that did not move while its source's record moved. Because every movement leaves a posting and every lapse shows itself, a score's history can be reconstructed and its currency checked.

KNOW-R064

KNOW-R064: The record behind a score SHALL keep the source's incentives and any evidence of manipulation visible, the considerations the Book's reliability framework names applying here as record duties, and, as this framework's own addition, a score SHALL NOT rise on the volume, fluency, or availability of a source's material, only on the dimensions the record keeps.

Volume is cheap, and fluency cheaper; this clause keeps both from buying trust. It requires the record behind a score to keep the source's incentives and any evidence of manipulation visible, the considerations the Book's reliability framework names applying here as record duties, and, as the framework's own addition, it bars a score from rising on the volume, fluency, or availability of a source's material, allowing a rise only on the dimensions the record keeps. The host names the misuse plainly: the loudest source becoming the most trusted without a dimension moving. A rise based on volume, fluency, or availability breaches the clause, incentives stay visible in the record behind the score, and evidence of manipulation cannot be tidied out of the books without breaching it.

KNOW-R065

KNOW-R065: This framework defines trust-scoring records only. It SHALL NOT score any source, admit or reject any material, or operate any intake or review, and it SHALL NOT create authority. A score is a reading of the books, never a forecast of the next entry, and the best-kept record can still precede a false report.

Restraint closes the framework. The clause confines it to defining trust-scoring records only: it bars the framework from scoring any source, admitting or rejecting any material, or operating any intake or review, and it bars it from creating authority. Two cautions carry the meaning further: a score is a reading of the books, never a forecast of the next entry, and the best-kept record can still precede a false report. The host's closing line gives the why, that this Draft scores no one and every source stands unscored before it; a definitional text mistaken for an operating one would begin scoring by implication. Any scoring, admission, or authority claimed on this framework alone is refusable at once, and readers know its words describe forms, not verdicts.

Where this document sits

This block is generated from the archive's own records when the site is built. It records position only and creates no authority.